Archive for the ‘Brand Stewardship’ Category

Google and the right way to (not) do SEO

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

Often times we hear from our clients: “What can you do to get me higher up in search results from Google?” This is often a tricky question because while some sentiments are spot on, we often need to be diplomatic in our approach.

The most straightforward answer we give is that the organic search results are always the “most relevant.” This is a loaded term, but needs to be understood. The engineers and folks at Google are a whole lot smarter than we can ever be, and so we always have to assume that the sites which appear in search results are those that are best suited – most relevant – to the user. If Google could not promise this relevancy, no one would bother to pay for ads. And we know Google’s getting plenty of people to pay for their services.

This system cannot be gamed or overcome through techniques that SEO marketers will try to sell you. There are no magic bullets or tricks you can use to make your site more “relevant.”

There are, however, plenty of  good design practices you can implement in your site, some of which even come from Google. We take these recommendations to heart and always build our sites to be findable.

And guess what? It works. One of our clients, Fleetwood RV, Inc., manufactures recreational vehicles. So what search term could be the most relevant? We found in our analytics that most people arriving from search engines didn’t even need to use it: they are searching for “fleetwood” and “fleetwood rv.” It’s easy and not much of a challenge for the site to appear in those search results, but what about more generic terms?

As of today, without any special voodoo or other questionable attempts to raise their site’s PageRank, fleetwoodrv.com is currently #3 for the oh-so-generic term of “rv.” We know that the products on http://fleetwoodrv.com are relevant to those searching for RVs, and based on our approach of building a site that provides the right information, our client is seeing substantial traffic from Google.

Failing in the “Last Mile”

Wednesday, September 17th, 2008
kliik_modelWe at Pivot + Levy have been talking a lot about the “Last Mile” lately. This is the final point of contact between thinking about buying and actually purchasing – the consumer facing website and the retailer. If your final customer is excited about a big purchase, but can’t explore the product online, or knows more about the product than the salesperson they interact with at the retail level, your brand has failed them.

(more…)

The demise of the Jeep brand?

Wednesday, June 4th, 2008

“It’s a Jeep thing. You wouldn’t understand”. You have seen it before, most likely on a beat up old Jeep’s windshield behind you at a stop sign. Jeep owners, with CJ’s and Wranglers in particular, are a family of sorts. They wave or nod to each other in the streets, signaling a mutual sign of appreciation for each other. This extreme brand loyalty is unique to Jeep among modern car manufacturers.

With such a strong brand following, each new Jeep that is introduced to market faces heavy scrutiny by current Jeep owners. Over the years, Jeep owners slowly accepted the steady modernization of their beloved CJ into the YJ and then the TJ Wranglers. New model introductions, like the Grand Cherokee and Commander, were still true to the Jeep brand promise of being “Trail Ready” and accepted into the Jeep family as cousins.

Then came the new Jeep lineup, and the introduction of the first 4-door Wrangler. It is obviously designed to complete against the FJ Cruiser and Hummer’s H3, but has Jeep has gone too far? Does this new Jeep stray too far from the Jeep brand with it’s 4 doors and power windows? Or will it’s familiar removable top, slatted grill, and true trail readiness be enough to grant it entrance into the Jeep family?

Only time will tell if this new arrival will be brought into the fold, but the real brand killers come in the form of the Jeep Compass and Jeep Patriot. Both are not built to leave the road and this goes against everything the Jeep brand stands for. Although in the short run these two new models may help Jeep sell a few more vehicles, the potential damage to their brand in a crowded space like the auto industry is not a risk that I would take.

< ?php wp_footer(); ?>